In The Shadow Of Mt Hollywood

The outcome of the November 3 election has little direct effect on an issue that's been simmering for much of the year, the arbitrary and inconsistent COVID restrictions imposed by the states, over which (so far) the president has little direct control. At my old blog, I covered the ongoing legal campaign to limit extra-legislative actions by state, county, and municipal authorities to override First Amendment rights of speech, assembly, and free exercise of religion using the largely manufactured COVID-19 "pandemic", for instance in this post from October 19 . The status of various cases moving through federal and state courts is very mixed. The most important cases are currently an opinion by Judge William S. Stickman IV in the federal Western District of Pennsylvania courts effectively declaring the Pennsylvania COVID restrictions unconstitutional. I covered this in my old blog, for instance here . HIs order is stayed pending appeal. Another case is a ruling by a...

Via Gateway Pundit , I see that Sidney Powell has tweeted, in response to someone urging her actually to release it, "The Kraken was released several days ago," with a quote from scripture. But a number of intelligent commentators have already been giving her the benefit of the doubt, expecting the real kraken would appear as she could release more evidence. Now, apparently what we see now is what we get. I'm starting to lose confidence. The video below from Robert Gruler, while again giving Powell the benefit of the doubt, is also increasingly skeptical: At about 25:00, he makes an important point: a certain part of the Powell-Giuliani argument is that key Deep State actors in the FBI and CIA worked against Trump throughout his administration. The difficulty with this, according to Gruler, is that Trump was their boss. If he didn't like what they were doing, he could fire and replace any of them, as in fact he did sporadically. But the Trump team's argu...

As I've said, one of the best commentators on the surrent cycle is Robert Barnes. He appeared on the Viva Frei YouTube channel Sunday night to discuss developments, and they had a segment on Sidney Powell and the kraken: Although Barnes has tweeted that he's now on Trump's electoral team, the indication he gives is that he's working in Georgia and hasn't spoken with Powell, and he doesn't know what the kraken specifically is. He and David, the Viva Frei host, agree that Powell is a prominent and reputable attorney who appears confident in the knowledge of circumstances she hasn't yet explanied very fully, but they also agree that time is running out. In two appearences yesterday, Powell left me concerned that whatever legal atrategy she's following, it doesn't appear to be fully coherent. She went on Lou Dobbs to discuss an affadavit from a founder of Smartmatic that outlined a system capability of recording votes by individual voters, but changi...

My earlier post today discussed a pretty simple evidentiary question that might be used to establish that election data was unlawfully manipulated on Novembr 3-4, and it could conceivably be used to challenge election results during an audit or recount. I also assume the Trump election team is on top of this. But is it a kraken? I'm wonderimng if there's more than meets the eye here. On Friday, Rep Louie Gohmert told Chris Salcedo on Newsmax that computer servers were seized by a US Army force in Frankfurt, Germany. The report suggested they were owned by a Spanish company, Scytl. Gohmert, Sidney Powell,, and attorney L Lin Wood all issued cryptic tweets referring to this alleged raid. The raid, or at least specific details of it, were then fact-checked by corporate media and designated false. The AP said , False. Both the Army and Scytl told The Associated Press the claim is not true. Furthermore, Scytl does not have offices or servers in Frankfurt, Germany. Scy...

Over the weekend, Sidney Powell, a prominent attorney best known as Gen Flynn's lawyer but currently working with the Trump election team, teased that she would "release the Kraken" regarding election fraud. On Sunday, she gave at least two interviews with additional details. The more informative was on OAN, as reported at Gateway Pundit . Referring to a system capability allegedly available with Dominion voting machines, she said Sidney Powell: They can watch the voting real time. They can run a computer algorithm on it as needed to either flip votes, take votes out or alter the votes to make a candidate win… It’s massive criminal voter fraud, writ large across at least 29 states… It’s obvious the algorithm and the statistics that our experts are tracking out are batches of votes and when the votes changed. It’s going to blow the mind of everyone in this country when we can get it all together and can explain it with the affidavits and the experts that have come forw...

Robert Barnes's offhand remark anout the 1824 and 1876 elections brought me to think for rhe first time about actual US elections that weren't resolved in the Electoral College as outlined in Article II, Section 1 and the Twelfth Amendment to the US Constitution. The 1824 election is so far the only one that was resolved in the House as specified in the Twelfth Amendment. As I said yesterday, of the two candidates with the most votes, John Quincy Adams was selectd over Andrew Jackson, who went on to win the 1828 election. All four of the candidates in 1824 were Democrats, by the way. Exactly what went on in the House is a different subject that I won't discuss here, except to say that 1824, being pre-Reconstruction, must not have been governed by the same behind-the-scenes forces, such as the post-Civil War industrial fortunes, that governed 1876-77. But let's look at the bigger picture. In its first 100 years, the US had not two, but three elections that weren'...

An offhand remark by Robert Barnes a week ago planted a seed in my thinking: he said the current contested election cycle should be compared to the contested elections of 1824 and 1876. Now, maybe I wasn't paying attention in American History class, but I don't think much was ever said about either of these elections. In the 1824 election, none of the candidates, led by John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson, achieved a majority in the Electoral College. Under the provisions of the Twelfth Amendment to the US Constitution, the election went to the House of Representatives, where Adams was selected. I may discuss this separately in greater depth. The 1824 lection was the only contested election to go to the House. A similar disputed electoral result of 19 votes in 1876 was resolved by an ad hoc commission. Rutherford B Hayes, who had already been nominated as a compromise candidate by the Republicans in 1876, was awarded the 19 disputed votes, plus an additional vote from a disq...