Posts

There Are Still Questions About The Pelosi Attack

Image
As I noted earlier this week, many of the original questions about David DePape's assault on Paul Pelosi arose from the poorly written account SFPD Chief Scott originally gave of the event, made worse by at least two subsequent "clarifications" that raised more questions than they answered. For now, it seems as though we have a version of the attack that's more or less reliable in its general outlines: David DePape, a disorganized psychotic, was able to bypass the home's security, break in via a rear door, surprise Pelosi while he was sleeping, and engage in an incoherent exchange that gave Pelosi the opportunity to pick up a phone and call 911. The 911 operator, sensing something was wrong as Pelosi sought to communicate in code, caused the police dispatcher to declare an emergency, at which point the police quickly arrived. This set of events took place within the span of a few minutes. There seems to be no reason to doubt that DePape and Pelosi did not know e...

The Gentry Is Getting Nervous

Image
A piece by Emily Oster from Monday in the Atlantic, home of David Brooks and Francis Fukuyama, Let's Declare A Pandemic Amnesty , has attracted a certain amount of comment. Ms Oster, an economics professor at Brown University, points this out in her piece to establish her credentialed membership in the elite, which is the platform from which she makes her proposal: In the face of so much uncertainty, getting something right had a hefty element of luck. And, similarly, getting something wrong wasn’t a moral failing. Treating pandemic choices as a scorecard on which some people racked up more points than others is preventing us from moving forward. We have to put these fights aside and declare a pandemic amnesty. We can leave out the willful purveyors of actual misinformation while forgiving the hard calls that people had no choice but to make with imperfect knowledge. Los Angeles County closed its beaches in summer 2020. . . . Moving on is crucial now, because the pandemic...

New Info Leaks Out On Pelosi Security

Image
Yesterday I asked why the Pelosi San Francisco home didn't have even the sort of doorway alarms that come with ordinary suburban home security systems. I got a partial answer in this morning's news . According to the Washington Post: The U.S. Capitol Police had cameras outside the home of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, but they were not monitored, according to three sources familiar with the matter. Capitol Police saw the flash of police lights on the camera, rewound the video and saw the break-in, according to the sources. It is unclear whether or not the cameras should have been monitored at the time. Just the News has a slightly different version : A live security video feed at the home of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi caught the suspect in the recent assault on her husband Paul Pelosi, but no one from the U.S. Capitol Police was watching, sources told Just the News. U.S. Capitol Police did not return numerous requests for comment on Tuesday. A source reveal...

Well, I Was Partly Right

Image
The one inference I made in yesterday's post that was completely correct was that Chief Scott of the San Francisco Police Department was not promoted for his communication skills. His statements following the incident at the Pelosi home were vague and required at least two subsequent clarifications, themselves vague and confusing. The criminal complaint filed yesterday by the FBI , in contrast, provides a consistent narrative that for now seems credible, although it in itself raises other questions, in particular why there was in fact so little security at the Pelosi home in light of the Speaker's position in the line of presidential succession. The criminal complaint is based in part on interviews with Paul Pelosi himself, one in the ambulance immediately after the attack, as well as police body cam footage. These were available to Chief Scott and his staff before he issued any public statement and could have been used to much better effect than they were. Our institutions...

Here's One Thing You Learn From Live PD/OP Live

Image
The photo above is an illustration of the type of body cameras worn by officers of the San Francisco Police Department. In current technology, police body cameras activate automatically, often when officers exit their police vehicles. They can't be turned off. I'll get to this below. One thing you learned as a fan of Live PD , which following its cancellation by A&E has been cloned and resuscitated as OP Live by the REELZ network, is that police departments that allow camera crews to ride along inevitably assign the crews to their best officers. They'd be shooting themselves in the foot if they didn't, since bungled arrests, episodes of brutality, or community relations disasters would all be caught on tape, while conversely, it's to their credit to have a courteous, diverse, effective patrol force on full public display. My wife and I have watched these shows long enough, since some of the departments have participated in them over many seasons, to see som...

Trouble Sure Seems To Follow Paul Pelosi Around, Doesn't It?

Image
As of this morning, the lid looks to be well and truly down on the Paul Pelosi home invasion-hammer attack story. This must surely be the case if the first call he placed after his DUI accident last May was to the family fixer, after which we heard nothing that wasn't thoroughly massaged, cleaned, and spun. But never fear, J Edgar's here. That means we can be pretty sure we've learned all we're ever going to hear, despite the truly hinky narrative that trickled out Friday and Saturday. Recognizing that we're dealing with something like the fog of war here, with garbled and incomplete reports based on misunderstandings, the story that's initally emerged just doesn't add up, start to finish. Here's what's implied about the start: Suspect David DePape, 42, had broken into the home in the wee hours of Friday morning, demanding to see the powerful lawmaker, who was out of town, according to police. I think if we were more careful, though, the...

Why Is He Hearing This On The Tarmac?

Image
One of yesterday's stories caught my eye , but not for the reason it was reported. Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Thursday was caught on a hot mic saying Democrats are “going downhill” in Georgia. Schumer was speaking in a huddle with President Biden on the tarmac about the midterm elections ahead of the president’s trip to New York. “The state where we’re going downhill is Georgia,” Schumer told Biden. “It’s hard to believe that they will go for Herschel Walker.” Republican commentators found this delicious, since it's an indication of where the November elections are headed. But the whole vignette raises a different question for me. We must assume Sen Schumer is referring to internal Democrat polling, which is generally thought to be more reliable, in part because it's paid for and thus more expensive than the free stuff you get from the media. But information has value. Valuable information is protected the same way we protect valuable mercha...