Dominion Sidesteps On Fox

A spokesman for Dominion Voting Systems appeared on Fox News today to repeat, pretty much verbatim, the claims Dominion has made on its website about its role in the election. The spokesman on Fox, Michael Steel, is identified as a principal with Hamilton Place Strategies. Hamilton Place's website says, "We understand complex topics, explain issues to target audiences, and persuade critical stakeholders." In other words, it's a PR firm. I'd suggest Dominion needs a crisis management firm instead, but that's just me.

What's interesting here is that Dominion's own executives backed out of testifying at a Pennsylvania House hearing on Friday, but today, they've delegated to a PR flack to make statements that we may reasonably assume Dominion's attorneys advised its executives not to make, as they could either be taken as admissions against interest or statements that could be used to challenge them on cross-examination. I suspect as well that Dominion was nevertheless under pressure to say more in response to the continuing controlversy, and the clearly scripted exchange witn the Fox talking head implies that the controversy isn't going away.

Maria Bartiromo had a good list of questions that ought to be asked of Dominion on her show this morning:

Thee are questions Michael Steel isn't qualified to answer and will at some point need to be posed with Dominion. All Steel did was dismiss legitimate questions like these as "conspiracy theories". It sounds as if Bartiromo is talking with some serious people, and these questins aren't going to go away.

Comments

  1. Adam SlusserNovember 22, 2020 at 7:10 PM

    I enjoy your writing very much, and I am delighted that you are reporting on these topics.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Please Don't Throw Me Over There In The Briar Patch, Brer Fox!

Image
In 2021, I thought Bill Clinton was a pretty good Br'er Rabbit . How wrong I could be. Among yesterday's headlines was, Trump’s Legal “Super Tuesday”: The Trump Arrest Will Start One Of The Most Bizarre Presidential Elections In History. Prof Turley's implication in that piece is that Trump has got the 2024 primary process wrapped up a full year ahead of time, and of course, this is courtesy of his enemies, or more accurately, an unreliable and out-of-control faction of his enemies, the Lumpenproletariat represented by leniency-for-criminals District Attorney Bragg. The New York political establishment is belatedly waking up to what it's done. Acting New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan rejected pleas for extended coverage by multiple media outlets — including the New York Times, CNN, the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post — ahead of Trump’s first court appearance after they declared “this indictment involves a matter of monumental signific...
Read more

Mars And The Living Desert Problem

Image
I keep thinking back on the Mars mission special I watched a week ago. A space probe professor type made a remark that, to the great disappointment of all the space probe professors, Mars looked like the Sonoran desert or something. Well, not actually. the 1953 Disney film The Living Desert simply contradicts that characterization. The Sonoran desert doesn't look much like Mars at all. What appears to be the conventional wisdom promoted in the current media discussion of life on Mars is that, given liquid water and t amount of time, life will appear in some microbial form and evolve from there. The quantity given for t is at most a billion years, because that's the time span Mars is supposed to have had liquid water. Where they got that isn't explained, but let's grant it. I went to Wikipedia's timeline of life on Earth. I recognize that all these estimates, a billion years for water on Mars, 4.4 billion years ago for the first liquid water on Earth and so f...
Read more

"They Know Where It Came From And Where It Went, And For Some Reason, They Don't Want To Comment."

Image
The FBI is coming closer to saying it , but it's still talking around the point: The FBI on Monday delivered a warning to the public: don’t shoot guns or point lasers at mysterious drones in the sky. Pilots of manned aircraft are increasingly being hit in the eyes with lasers because people on the ground think they see a drone, according to the FBI’s field office in Newark, New Jersey. The FBI is also concerned that people might shoot a gun at a manned aircraft after mistaking it for a drone. Notice that the clumsily worded release mentions "manned aircraft", but it doesn't use a much clearer phrase, "commercial airliner", which is what the vast majority of these sightings are. Over the past few days, I've noted that the most-cited videos portray what Megyn Kelly breathlessly reported are going from dusk to around 11:00 at night, they say. Look at this. Another eyewitness told the New York Times the drones show up one aft...
Read more