An At Best Obtuse Piece By Harold Myerson

I've been noting the peculiar incongruity of Real Clear Politics's opinion choices, especially its frequent platforming of far-left figures like Harold Myerson and Robert Reich, while they seldom publish conservatives much to the right of Victor Davis Hanson and Roger Kimball, who at this stage are just mainstream Republicans and boring ones at that. The other day, RCP ran this Myerson piece, The Democrats’ On-Again, Off-Again Class Politics.

Myerson argues that the New Deal-Fair Deal politics of FDR and Truman were "class-based", but the later politics of Adlai Stevenson and John Kennedy were not.

[W]hile working in John F. Kennedy’s White House, [Arthur] Schlesinger [Jr] comes away from a meeting with UAW President Walter Reuther and Sen. Hubert Humphrey, noting that both of them still spoke in “the New Deal’s distinctive rhetoric. Walter and Hubert could talk about ‘the people,’ about their ultimate wisdom, and the importance of doing things for them, in a way quite alien to the New Frontier”—the not particularly class-based perspective of the Kennedy administration. “I wish I could figure out,” Schlesinger laments, “the terms in which the idealism and imagination of the New Deal could be infused into the anti-sentimental, anti-rhetorical, understated mood of the New Frontier,” whose leaders he terms “technocrats.”

Read today, these passages illuminate the links between the shifting shapes of American liberalism—and, for that matter, American socialism—and the American economy. Writing at a time when New Deal reforms had produced an economy of opportunity “as secure and unalterable” as the landscape, when, as historian Nelson Lichtenstein recently noted in our pages, the real wages of working-class Americans doubled in a single generation, the postwar Democratic establishment had abandoned the class politics of its predecessors, whose victories had appeared to create a permanent middle-class majority.

Reuther and Humphrey, by contrast, were at that point semi-social democrats who were concerned about those who either didn’t make it into that middle-class majority or whose membership therein was precarious.

He then says that the resurgence of the Democratic Socialists of America is a return to "class-based" New Deal liberalism.

There are virtually no young people today who view their economic prospects as “secure and unalterable,” a view we now know was peculiar to the boomer generation. Is it any wonder that DSA, despite the fierce moral commitments of its founders, stayed a small organization of several thousand until the crash of 2008 and its prolonged and incomplete recovery made clear to young people, then and since, that the economy—deregulated and all but devoid of unions—was anything but secure? Is it any wonder that this year’s Democratic primaries, including this week’s in Florida, are defined by the precinct-walking and phone-banking of the young, class-based left, while the Democrats opposed to them can mobilize money but few if any volunteers?

But if the new DSA liberalism is "class-based", which class are we talking about? According to Nate Silver,

As a result of contentious Democratic primaries in Michigan, Maine, and New York, I’ve been reading a lot of conversation about the role that class plays in voting patterns in the United States. In these primaries, candidates like Graham Platner and Abdul El-Sayed who are associated with democratic socialism often claim to have the mandate of the working class. But in practice, their strengths tend to be with college-educated voters.

. . . I’m reminded here of Peter Turchin’s elite overproduction hypothesis. It basically argues that America is producing “too many” college graduates relative to the number of high-prestige, well-paying jobs available to them. People who wind up in this situation often carry heavy student loan burdens or other sorts of debt. Even if their material situation is objectively “just fine,” it’s rarely great. They’re gloomy about their own financial prospects, and feel aggrieved about the state of the country. Their class status is ambiguous: privileged in some senses, but they’re part of the “have-nots” in other meaningful ways.

. . . [W]hat is the most Democratic voting group in America? It’s voters with postgraduate degrees but lower-to-middle household incomes of $30K to $60K per year.

This is very much also the sweet spot for the DSA. In the group’s most recent member survey in 2021, 80 percent of members aged 25 or older had bachelor’s degrees, but 45 percent had household incomes below $60,000 per year.

This isn't the working class. But I decided to do some research on Harold Myerson. Originally, I wondered if he was a "red diaper baby", but it turns out that strictly speaking, he isn't, if the term is used exclusively to mean a child of Communist Party USA members. Instead, according to Wikipedia,

Meyerson was born to a Jewish family in Los Angeles. He was educated in the Los Angeles public schools and at Columbia University. The son of long time leaders in California of the Socialist Party of America, he was active in the 1970s in the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee.

So this led me to look into the Socialist Party of America, whose most prominent member was Norman Thomas, definitely not a member of the working class:

Thomas was the oldest of six children, born November 20, 1884, in Marion, Ohio, to Emma Williams (née Mattoon) and Weddington Evans Thomas, a Presbyterian minister. . . . The summer after he graduated from high school his father accepted a pastorate at Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, which allowed Norman to attend Bucknell University. He left Bucknell after one year to attend Princeton University, the beneficiary of the largesse of a wealthy uncle by marriage. Thomas graduated magna cum laude from Princeton in 1905.

He went on to become a socially active Presbyterian pastor, but the denomination found him a little too socially active, and by the 1920s, he'd become editor of The Nation and had begun running for president as leader of the Socialist Party of America. With an Ivy League degree from the era when the Ivies were class-based institutions, he was a bourgeois socialist along the lines of the UK Fabian Society. We may assume Harold Myerson was brought up in a family with similar views, and he went to an Ivy in the 1960s when these views were typical, if inchoate.

So neither Norman Thomas nor Harold Myerson had a working-class background, and neither do the vast majority of DSA members. And this is nothing new, it goes straight back to Norman Thomas. I think this is related to another trend I've been noting for a while, the alliance between the upper bourgeoisie and Marx's Lumpenproletariat, petty criminals, addicts, idlers, sexual deviants, and undocumented migrants. The DSA romanticizes the Lumpenproletriat, apparently out of guilt and perhaps envy that the underclass is somehow more authentic than the upper bourgeoisie, and they want to claim that they're the real working class, not, say, the prosperous union workers whom David Brooks derides as "patio man" in the pages of The Atlantic, The New york Times, and The Washington Examiner:

Certain profound questions flow through his mind. Is a 542-square-inch grilling surface really enough, considering that he might someday get the urge to roast an uncut buffalo steak? Though the matte steel overcoat resists scratching, doesn’t he want a polished steel surface on his grill so he can glance down and admire his reflection as he is performing the suburban manliness rituals, such as brushing tangy sauce on meat slabs with his right hand while clutching a beer can in an NFL foam insulator ring in his left?

Myerson is having a hard time getting his head around the idea that these are the people that Walter Reuther, Hubert Humphrey, Harry Truman, and FDR represented.

Eric Swalwell Can't Win For Losing

Here's what puzzles me about Eric Swalwell. He's a major pretty boy, a very good-looking guy who should have no trouble with the ladies, but somehow, he's been repeatedly brought down by trouble with the ladies. The long-running saga of his affair with the Chinese spy Fang Fang began in 2014 while Swalwell had a seat on the House Intelligence Committee:

The FBI assessment, which later became a full-fledged investigation, centered on allegations that Swalwell awarded internships at his offices in exchange for campaign contributions. The FBI identified Fang “Christine” Fang, a Chinese national, as the alleged facilitator of this exchange and alleged she employed conduits to route illegal donations.

Swalwell also admitted that he had “physical relations with Fang” on multiple occasions, according to the FBI summary of his 2015 interview with agents. In a subsequent interview in 2016, Swalwell detailed one incident where Fang showed up at his door, after which Swalwell said they “hooked up,” according to the second interview summary released by the White House.

This guy could dance with just about any lady he wanted, but he's got to get it from a spy? But the Democrat establishment covered for him over another dozen years, until new allegations broke earlier this year:

A former staffer of Rep. Eric Swalwell, a leading Democratic candidate for California governor, says that the congressman raped her when she was heavily intoxicated and left her bruised and bleeding, an allegation Swalwell strongly denies.

“I was pushing him off of me, saying no,” the woman told CNN of the incident, which she said happened in 2024 after she had stopped working in Swalwell’s office. “He didn’t stop.”

She said it was the second time Swalwell had nonconsensual sexual contact with her while she was drunk. In 2019, when she was still working for him, she said she woke up naked with him in a hotel room after a night of heavy drinking. She said she had no memory of what happened but could feel physically that they’d had sexual contact.

Three other women who spoke with CNN also alleged various kinds of sexual misconduct by the Democratic congressman – including Swalwell sending them unsolicited explicit messages or nude photos.

That ended his California governor campaign, and it forced his resignation from Congress. Again, there should have been no obstacle to him having consensual sex with any number of women who didn't work for him, much less needing to rape anyone, but he had to go out and deliberately seek extra trouble. But that wasn't enough. Last week,

FBI agents confronted Eric Swalwell with a search warrant when he landed at San Francisco Airport Saturday and seized the former congressman's electronic devices, including his cell phone, as part of a federal criminal investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct, the Daily Mail can exclusively reveal.

Swalwell's MacBook Pro, charging cable, and wall charger were also seized during the search, which was conducted at 8.25pm, according to a warrant obtained by The San Francisco Standard.

The search warrant, filed on August 13, was filed under a federal statute (Section 242 of Title 18) which prohibits officials, including law enforcement, from abusing their authority to deprive someone of their constitutional rights - though it is unclear how the law applies to Swalwell's case.

This piece provides more insight:

The Swalwell search warrant was apparently issued under 18 U.S.C. § 242, a federal civil-rights statute that applies when someone uses their governmental authority to deprive another person of rights provided to them either through the Constitution or by federal law.

That statute is often used against law-enforcement officers who are accused of abusing their authority. For example, the Standard points out, the officers involved in George Floyd's death were charged under that same statute, which is not strictly limited to police.

. . . The Standard also referred to the case of former Waterbury, Connecticut, Mayor Philip Giordano, who was convicted under the §242 statute back in 2003 for using the power of his office – and his connections to police – to intimidate two girls he had sexually abused into not ratting him out.

It's important to note here that authorities have not accused Swalwell of doing anything similar, nor does the reference to the statute on the warrant indicate that he committed a similar crime.

. . . Tony Brass, a former federal prosecutor who spoke to the Standard, said the statute could potentially come into play if investigators believe Swalwell used his position in Congress to intimidate witnesses or somehow interfere with another person's rights.

Between the involvement of the FBI's Public Corruption and Civil Rights Squad and the statute that's cited in the warrant, this may turn out to be about more than just the sexual misconduct allegations.

So the implication here seems to be that not only did he get a thrill from being a good-looking guy who nevertheless raped and sexually harassed women, we might surmise that he also got a thrill out of intimidating the same women to keep them from blowing the whistle on him. I asked Chrome AI mode, "Why do good-looking, sexually attractive men need to resort to rape and sexual harassment?" It answered,

Sexual violence and harassment are motivated by power, control, and entitlement, not by a lack of sexual access or physical attraction. Research in psychology and criminology consistently demonstrates that perpetrating sexual assault is a behavioral choice driven by a desire to dominate, demean, or exert authority over another person. /p>

For many perpetrators, the primary gratification comes from the act of forcing compliance and overpowering a victim, rather than the sexual act itself. /p>

Highly attractive or socially successful individuals may possess a distorted sense of privilege, believing they are inherently owed attention, compliance, or sexual gratification.

The problem is that Swalwell is starting to look like a serial loser, along with his bros Kevin Morris and Hunter Biden. They should really start a 12-step program for losers.

Don't Tell This Guy About Cell Phone Tracking!

A Florida man found a legal loophole to block a Flock surveillance camera using a 12-foot-tall protest sign.

77-year-old Carl Gunn legally blocks a Flock license plate camera in St. Petersburg, Florida, by sitting on a public sidewalk and holding a 12-foot pool skimmer pole with… pic.twitter.com/x3iMcU37RZ

— Historic Vids (@historyinmemes) August 19, 2026

If this guy ever finds out about cell phone tracking, he'll need to cover his umbrella with tinfoil. I'm amazed at the level of paranoia about automated license plate readers, especially Flock cameras, since all they do is trace the location of automobiles. Your cell phone can trace where you are, in a car or not, and GPS is only one way it does this. Nevertheless,

A Wisconsin woman was pulled over at gunpoint twice in one week after Milwaukee Police Department staff failed to remove a vehicle alert from the Flock license plate camera system. TWICE it happened.

Years ago, in the NCIC(National Crime Information Center) files there was a BIG problem that cost the city of Los Angeles millions because- again, short version- they found out that the Police Department, after finding out the description they'd used in the original stolen car/wanted person entry, was not valid, they re-entered the stuff WITH THE SAME INFORMATION. Which led to the poor bastard being pulled out of his car at gunpoint several times. When he filed a case, the judge read that, said "You have no excuse after the first mistake" and awarded the guy a big settlement.Now we have effing Flock cameras being used as if they're part of the LE network, and getting people pulled out of their cars at gunpoint. And, similar to the NCIC problem, if people don't make damn sure information is cleared out when it should be, sooner or later some poor bastard pays the price.

Yes, mistakes get made, and as the case above shows, they were made before Flock cameras, but why is everyone in such a snit? This may come a little closer:

Back in 2013 and 2014 we shared the story of a man returning to Florida was stopped by police in Maryland who asked him for his firearm. When the Floridian asked the Maryland police how they knew he owned a firearm, things got sketchy. {Go Deep} The event kicked off a constitutional discussion.

A few years later in 2015 the Wall Street Journal reported on a national federal database that was using Automatic License Plate Readers (APLRs) to capture and store the travel of millions of Americans {SOURCE}.

Now we fast-forward a decade and that federal database is now being exploited by local police around the nation to keep track of ordinary persons of interest to their community who travel outside their jurisdiction. This is where the Flock Cameras come into the discussion.

The same government interests who dismiss our concerns about privacy are the same govt interests who point out how horrible China and Iran are for monitoring their citizens on CCTV systems.

And now, vigilantes are taking matters into their own hands:

🚨#BREAKING: An Arizona man says he has, "absolutely zero regrets" after he was arrested for using his work truck to bend a Flock camera pole backwards until it faced the sky.

"I kept backing up, saw it bend back, I saw it looking at the sky... and said,

‘That’s good enough." pic.twitter.com/Edtc3LdnVi

— Matt Van Swol (@mattvanswol) August 13, 2026

Did somone say vigilante?

he first time that “NoMark” tried to knock out a Flock camera feed, he waited an hour for the perfect moment – pacing in and out of bushes that towered over him, a few feet behind a pole holding up the device.

. . . These black cameras, which are hooked up to a rectangular solar panel and typically mounted on a pole, snap photos of passing vehicles and run the pictures against large databases. They have sparked nationwide backlash from pro-privacy critics, who point to public records suggesting that these devices can help law enforcement keep tabs on specific license plates and the people driving these cars. That they can sweep in so many people’s location from an innocent act in a public space – regardless of whether the target is a suspect in a crime, and without a warrant – has led to fears of mass surveillance.

And oh, my, the libertarians! Call the intellectual welterweights at Instapundit! They're in a lather because some Iowa sheriff deputies have been advised not to mention Flock cameras to drivers, but the only sane comment in the thread is:

Did you have an expectation of privacy in public spaces before this? If so, why?

So why aren't the same people smashing their cell phones, or at least warning everyone that their cell phones can track them even when they aren't in their cars?

Many assume that turning off location services on their cell phone will prevent their location from being tracked. However, this is only partially accurate, as there are several other ways that your cell phone can still track your location, even when location services are turned off.

Location tracking is a feature that is essential to the functionality of our cell phones. This feature allows us to use various apps and services, such as maps, ride-sharing apps, and weather services, which require location information to provide accurate and personalized results. The location data is recorded by the phone using GPS, Wi-Fi, and cellular data.

Cell phones use a combination of GPS data, Wi-Fi data, and cell tower data to track location.

When you turn off location services on your phone, you are disabling the ability of apps on your phone to access your precise location data. This means that apps that rely on GPS, Wi-Fi, and cellular data to provide location-specific services will not be able to access your location. However, the cellular system must know where you are, so while your apps may no longer be able to access your cellular data, it is still being recorded.

. . . CDRs are a type of telecommunications data that provides detailed information about calls made and received on a mobile phone. These records contain a wealth of information, including the time and date of the call, the duration of the call, the number dialed, and the location of the cell tower that was used to transmit the call. CDRs are primarily used for billing and customer service purposes, but they can also be used to track the location of a mobile phone. Over time, this creates a historical record of the phone's location, which can be used to track its movements and determine where it has been at different times.

CDRs are mainly used by law enforcement and private companies, like Envista Forensics, when conducting investigations to determine the historic location of a person's phone or if someone was potentially distracted while driving by texting or talking on the phone.

Another reason the cellular system continuously tracks you is that cell phone providers are required by law to track your phone's location for emergency services. This means that even if you've turned off location services on your device, your phone is still communicating with nearby cell towers, allowing your provider to pinpoint your location in the event of an emergency. While this information is not available to third-party apps or advertisers, it is still collected and stored by the service providers. This means that even if we are not being actively tracked in real-time, our historic location is still being recorded in CDRs.

So why isn't there a much greater public panic over cell phones?

Whatever's Become Of Hunter's Sugar Bro, Kevin Morris?

We last checked in on Kevin Morris more than two years ago, when I posted,

But I can't resist posting on one footnote. Kevin Morris, Hunter's "sugar bro", attended at least the first day of Hunter's trial on Monday to support him, although as I posted here, after spending at least $6.5 million to pay Hunter's lawyers and fund his lifestyle, he's said to be out of money. I've been increasingly skeptical of the conventional Morris narrative -- he's a "Hollywood lawyer" who stopped practicing law 15 years ago, and he's a "novelist" who was never able to sell a blockbuster despite his wife being one of the most powerful agents in the industry. In other words, he's basically been just a dilettante living off his wife for more than a decade.

And his wife is probably key to the most recent development in the story. In my post two weeks ago, I concluded, "It looks like Mrs Kevin has staged an intervention, and she's cut Kevin off."

Since then, likely due to the efforts of Mrs Kevin's publicists, he's been mostly out of the news. In January, 2025, his home survived the Palisades fire, but his stash of Hunter's paintings went up in smoke:

A trove of nearly 200 artworks by Hunter Biden has been destroyed — one of the casualties of the wildfires ravaging Los Angeles, The Post has learned.

The controversial art had been in storage near the Pacific Palisades home of Hunter’s Hollywood attorney Kevin Morris and is valued at “millions of dollars,” a source close to the Biden family said.

Morris, who loaned the first son nearly $5 million to help pay a tax bill and has been financing a documentary on him, lives in a sprawling five-bedroom, six-bathroom home which is among the few houses still intact in the posh neighborhood, The Post can confirm.

However, despite losing his investment in Hunter's paintings -- which after 2025 were worth about the same whether intact or in ashes -- Morris appears still to be working on an ongoing Hunter Biden documentary project:

Days after reaching a plea deal with federal prosecutors on his unpaid taxes and a felony gun charge in 2023, Hunter Biden appeared panicked and short-tempered, according to leaked footage from a new documentary about the former first son seen by The Post.

“What are you talking about ‘I’m protected’?” wide-eyed Biden animatedly says into a cellphone in the footage, from the documentary-in-progress being made by Hollywood writer and lawyer Kevin Morris, who loaned Biden more than $6.5 million for personal expenses and back taxes.

Morris, a novelist and producer known for brokering deals for “South Park” and “The Book of Mormon,” had been trailing Biden with a film crew between 2021 and 2024, during his father Joe Biden’s White House term. He also documented the scandal-scarred ex-lobbyist’s foray into the art world.

In addition to recording the self-taught artist’s gallery openings in Los Angeles and New York, Morris was seen directing a film crew taping Hunter Biden outside courthouses where Biden appeared on tax evasion and the gun charge.

. . . It’s not clear when the documentary film will be released. Morris did not return a request for comment Monday. Hunter Biden’s attorney declined to comment Monday.

Wait a moment. Mrs Kevin is one of the most powerful agents in Hollywood, but "it’s not clear when the documentary film will be released?" But Morris's support for Hunter also helped foster a relationship with another priotege, Eric Swalwell:

A campaign filing that was released on Tuesday revealed that Morris, who was dubbed Hunter's "sugar brother," for bankrolling his legal bills and lavish lifestyle, donated $29,900 to Rep. Eric Swalwell's, D-Calif., gubernatorial campaign on Feb. 2.

Swalwell, who reportedly helped orchestrate Hunter's surprise press conference outside the Capitol in December 2023 while he defied the House Oversight Committee's subpoenas to testify behind closed doors, was one of the loudest critics of the GOP investigations into Hunter during the Biden administration.

"There is absolutely zero evidence Hunter or his father acted corruptly," Swalwell said at the time. "So I’m not going to sit quietly and let MAGA Republicans do Trump’s bidding in Congress."

. . . During his time helping Hunter Biden, Morris faced multiple bar complaints, including from the Trump-aligned America First Legal, which accused Morris of violating California's Rules of Professional Conduct after he was publicly photographed smoking marijuana while Hunter Biden, a recovering addict, was around visiting.

. . . Swalwell's support at the 2023 press conference by reserving the "Senate Swamp," a popular area near the Capitol that is often used for press conferences, raised questions at the time about whether the California congressman played a role in the then-first son's decision to deny a congressional subpoena from Republicans seeking to question him about his alleged crimes and other financial dealings.

Morris, who previously maxed out donations totaling over $6,000 to Swalwell's House campaign in early 2023, and Swalwell stood beside each other during the viral press conference later that year.

"Degenerates of a feather flock together," a longtime GOP strategist told Fox News Digital. "Eric Swalwell is literally Hunter Biden's biggest cheerleader – from reserving the Senate Swamp to defending the Biden Crime Family's litany of illicit activities."

Morris and Swalwell also have ties to China that have raised questions among critics. In 2024, Morris confirmed to lawmakers that he still held a stake in a Chinese private equity firm that he took over from the president's son. Morris initially acquired the shares after purchasing Skaneateles LLC, a company that Hunter had previously owned, in the fall of 2021 as pressure mounted for Hunter to divest amid concerns about his stake in the China-based company.

The best that can be said of Morris is that he's a poor judge of character. Two months after the report of his $29,900 donation to Swalwell,

A former staffer of Rep. Eric Swalwell, a leading Democratic candidate for California governor, says that the congressman raped her when she was heavily intoxicated and left her bruised and bleeding, an allegation Swalwell strongly denies.

“I was pushing him off of me, saying no,” the woman told CNN of the incident, which she said happened in 2024 after she had stopped working in Swalwell’s office. “He didn’t stop.”

She said it was the second time Swalwell had nonconsensual sexual contact with her while she was drunk. In 2019, when she was still working for him, she said she woke up naked with him in a hotel room after a night of heavy drinking. She said she had no memory of what happened but could feel physically that they’d had sexual contact.

Three other women who spoke with CNN also alleged various kinds of sexual misconduct by the Democratic congressman – including Swalwell sending them unsolicited explicit messages or nude photos.

Swalwell ended his gubernatorial campaign two days later and resigned from Congress. Kevin Morris seems to have a reverse Midas touch.

Hunter Biden Resurfaces

It's mid-August, everyone's on vacation or wishes he was, nothing's new, so we get a Hunter Biden rerun, even in the Wall Street Journal. The piece is over 1000 words, has three bylines, and manages to convey absolutely no new information:

Those who have spent time with him say the public is now meeting the Hunter Biden they have known for a long time: a sharp observer of politics and media who has had his own life dragged through the mud.

. . . Former Biden White House aides said that Hunter was kept quiet in the White House because he was under federal investigation for much of his father’s time in the presidency. Former aides are now abuzz about what they considered to be a strong showing, and there is some regret they didn’t unleash him earlier, some said.

. . . After Hunter Biden’s laptop was found and its contents leaked, his online history was made public, including nude photos of himself doing illicit drugs. The scandal prompted years of investigations and conspiracies, often spread by some of the podcasters Biden is now choosing to sit with.

“In that total exposure, there was nowhere to hide,” Biden told Carlson.

Hunter's problem is we've already had too much information about the guy, and whatever scraps remain are just more of the same:

Not only is Hunter Biden talking, he is writing. His Substack has more than 65,000 subscribers for essays on sobriety and other topics. He offers paid subscriptions to his Substack that range from $10 a month to $750 a year. It couldn’t be learned how many of his subscribers have opted to upgrade from the free option.

Biden still paints and sells his abstract kaleidoscope-esque paintings using alcohol ink and metal straws, but has said that financial difficulties loom. He testified under oath that the focus on him during his father’s presidency left him in a deep monetary hole.

. . . As investigations into Biden mounted, he made a consequential decision in late 2022 to stop using a lawyer closely aligned with the Biden White House and hire Abbe Lowell, a defense attorney known for taking on high-profile clients and who, according to documents later filed in court, charged Biden $1,510 an hour.

. . . Lowell’s firm later sued Biden for fees in a continuing case, at one point indicating he owed close to $5 million.

For now, in addition to painting and Substack posts, Biden has taken a role as an adviser at a luxury addiction center, Peak Path Health. And his audience is expanding, including to everyday users on social-media platform X, where he has said he is speaking “finally on my terms, not yours.”

I looked into Peak Path Health. As of this past June,

Peak Path Health is proud to announce a new affiliation with Hunter Biden, who will join the organization as the chairperson of the newly established Peak Path Health Foundation, a nonprofit organization created in partnership with Peak Path Health to expand recovery support, advocacy, education, and community outreach efforts.

The announcement comes during a meaningful milestone in Hunter Biden's personal journey, as he celebrates seven years of sobriety this month. His recovery experience, combined with his ongoing work in community service and nonprofit leadership, brings a unique perspective to Peak Path Health's mission of helping individuals and families navigate substance use, mental health challenges, and long-term wellness.

Located in the Hollywood Hills and Woodland Hills areas of Los Angeles, California, Peak Path Health provides private, individualized care through medical detox, psychiatric services, and holistic wellness programs. The new relationship reflects a shared belief that recovery is possible and that access to compassionate, evidence-based care can change lives.

According to Radar Online,

Scandal-scarred Hunter Biden is trying to refurbish his tainted image, RadarOnline.com can reveal, by becoming – of all things – the executive director of an ultra-swanky drug and alcohol rehab center in L.A.'s Hollywood Hills.

. . . Hunter, who reportedly owes roughly $17million in legal bills, has also shockingly hinted he's willing to serve as California Governor Gavin Newsom's vice-presidential running mate in the 2028 election, telling the governor during a podcast: "Here's the deal. I'll run, but only as your VP, because the truth of the matter is that the vice president's residence is a lot cooler. It's a lot easier job, too."

Presidential historian Leon Wagener told RadarOnline.com: "I don't think he was joking, and neither did Newsom. I think Hunter thinks it's a good idea."

But there's a whole 'nother narrative, which Hunter pitched with Tucker Carlson:

The degenerate former first son shapeshifts to suit the proclivities of each interviewer, so he played to Carlson’s newfound paranoia about Israel, insinuating “Netanyahu” or “Mossad” were involved in hacking/stealing/fabricating his laptop/cloud, even though he previously blamed Russia.

. . . Hunter’s central lie is that he never took three waterlogged laptops for repair at John Paul Mac Isaac’s computer repair store in Wilmington, Del.

“I have literally zero recollection or memory of ever dropping off a laptop at John Paul Mac Isaac’s,” Hunter told Carlson.

Then he embarked on a meandering mélange of half-expressed falsehoods, throwing up Ukrainian, Russian and Chinese names, and, for Carlson’s benefit, the name of an Israeli-American “[Yaacov] Apelbaum.” More on him later.

“There is no such thing as a laptop. The laptop that [Mac Isaac] eventually turns over . . . to the FBI, the thing that [he] claims that he got off of a device was a hard drive . . . What he finds through this guy Apelbaum is Rudy Giuliani’s lawyer, Bob Costello . . .

“There’s no possible way all of the information that was eventually labeled as my laptop came from one laptop. It’s way too large . . . They hacked my cloud . . . There’s the Netanyahu side, the Israeli side. There is a Russian Ukrainian side of it. And then there are the US actors that include Steve Bannon, Rudy Giuliani, Miles Guo and a whole bunch of — Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman and all of these guys.”

Carlson’s response to this incomprehensible nonsense is: “I agree.”

Hunter's basic problem is there's no there there, and there never was. For a 30-year period, he was able to run a grift as part of the Biden family, but that's over. As of last year,

Amid lagging sales of his art and his memoir, the younger Biden remains "several million dollars" in debt after fighting multiple federal criminal cases, claiming in an affidavit that he only sold one painting for $36,000 since late 2023, after selling 27 paintings in the previous couple of years at an average price of nearly $55,000.

"Given the positive feedback and reviews of my artwork and memoir, I was expecting to obtain paid speaking engagements and paid appearances, but that has not happened," Hunter Biden wrote Wednesday.

He said that his "lack of financial resources has been exacerbated by the fires in the Pacific Palisades in early January, which has rendered my rental house unlivable for an extended period of time and, like many others in that situation, I am having difficulty in finding a new permanent place to live."

. . . Hunter Biden has acknowledged taking out millions of dollars in loans from Kevin Morris, a Hollywood attorney who largely bankrolled Hunter Biden's legal defense over the past five years. In congressional testimony last year, Morris said he expected Hunter Biden to repay those loans beginning in 2025, though it was not clear from the affidavit whether those loan repayments have begun.

Much Of The Arday Commentary Misses The Point

One version of the transatlantic ruling class's response to the Arday scandal is this piece at The Atlantic. The author, Tyler Austin Harper, represents himself as capital-B Black, but looking at photos, it seems he could easily pass for white. Still, let's grant that he's a descendant, however distant, of African slaves -- he's nevertheless of a distinctly different class from Jason Arday, who was a member of an entirely new socially engineered class of UK immigrants from former British colonies created by the postwar Labour government.

So about the only thing Harper has in common with Arday is that they share a certain amount of African DNA, but they're from two entirely different classes in two different countries. Nevertheless, Harper sees himself in precisely Arday's situation:

I will confess that, until yesterday, I had watched the Arday saga unfold with some combination of amusement and distress. Amusement because of the undeniable comic absurdity to the revelation that the best and brightest minds at Cambridge had been so easily deceived by a man who claimed to have run nine marathons in about as many days on a fractured fibula, and who maintained that his future had been predicted by a Brazilian shaman. Distress because I could relate to some of the things that Arday might have experienced.

I have written, in this magazine and elsewhere, about what it is like to be the beneficiary of affirmative action in elite spaces. I have seen, firsthand, the way a specific kind of white progressive treats Black men who have overcome obstacles. They cannot conceal a certain blend of pity and glee when they learn, for example, that my biological father left before I was old enough to walk, or that I was raised for a time by a single mother. It is a look that says, How far you’ve come, and how kind I am for helping you go further.

But in these same paragraphs, Harper distingushes himself from Arday in a key way: Arday lived in a fantasy world; Harper doesn't. I'm not a medical professional, and I can work only from the other lay observations I see of Arday's case, but more important than his skin color is the problem that Arday was seriously mentally ill. In trying to get some sort of handle on Arday's autism, I started out by asking Chrome AI, "Does a person whose life is dominated by fantasy have high-functioning autism?"

AI immediately slapped me down and said nobody says high-functioning any more, it's Level 1, 2, or 3 Support. So I revised my question: "What medical support level would apply to an autistic person whose life is dominated by fantasy?" It answered,

Medical professionals look at how the fantasy life interferes with the individual's ability to navigate the real world:

Level 1 (Requiring Support): The individual experiences a strong internal fantasy world or intense interest in fictional universes, but they can easily switch back to reality when needed. They can maintain a conversation, work, or attend school, though they may need help organizing tasks or managing social awkwardness.

Level 2 (Requiring Substantial Support): The fantasy life actively interferes with daily functioning. The individual may frequently talk about their fantasy world in social settings where it is inappropriate, struggle to focus on any topics outside of this fantasy, and show clear distress or behavioral meltdowns when forced to disengage from it.

Level 3 (Requiring Very Substantial Support): The individual's attachment to fantasy severely limits their ability to function or communicate safely in reality. They may struggle to distinguish fantasy from real-world dangers, require constant supervision to complete basic self-care, or completely withdraw from human interaction in favor of their internal world.

As a non-professional relying only on public information on Arday, I've got to say that he seems to have had real difficulty in switching from fantasy to reality; the discussion of his memoir that I linked yesterday showed that he'd completely reconstructed his life experiences based on a pop version of Spartacus and some soap operas and consistently gave this version when interviewed. He pretty clearly "talk[ed] about [his] fantasy world in social settings where it [was] inappropriate, struggle[d] to focus on any topics outside of this fantasy, and show[ed] clear distress or behavioral meltdowns when forced to disengage from it" -- i e, he took his own life.

Beyond that, if we look at his outcome, I think it's also reasonable to say his "attachment to fantasy severely limit[ed his] ability to function or communicate safely in reality". For an outcome other than the one he had, he almost certainly should have had better supervision. This also continues to raise for me the question of whether he was ever capable of doing any sort of basic intellectual work at the undergraduate or graduate level.

Arday's problem wasn't racism. His problem was that people were enabling him despite clear, serious symptoms of mental illness. They were doing it to further an agenda, but this agenda was different from the one on this side of the Atlantic. Harper fudges this difference:

Arday was fetishized in his ascendancy by white liberals, for whom he served as a mirror in which they could see their own goodness. And he was fetishized in his downfall by white conservatives who saw him as a test case for their own obsessions with an academic apparatus that they believe is not meritocratic enough—which is to say, not white enough.

The right would have us believe that the Arday scandal is a story of affirmative action taken to its most caricaturish conclusion. Many progressives see it as something else: a racist witch hunt in which self-righteous zealots with suspect motives hounded a man to death.

As I said yesterday, the closest parallel in the US to the Arday case is Claudine Gay, who resigned as president of Harvard after allegations of plagiarism. However, these were much milder than those against Arday, and they didn't appear alongside any fantastical statements by Gay about her life story that called her mental stability into question. Nor did Gay fall especially far; she remains a well-paid member of the Harvard faculty, and she didn't take her own life. Arday's situation is uniquely extreme and says little about racism in the US except in comparison.

What I can only surmise as a non-professional from public information is that Arday's autism put him somewhere in medical support levels 2 or 3, which suggests that even to perform basic intellectual tasks and form goals consistent with a high-flying academic career, he needed extensive assistance. He simply couldn't have functioned at that level without near-constant supervision.

That says to me that we should be looking for a Svengali, "an authority figure or mentor who exerts undue, usually evil influence over another person." So far, nobody has suggested this, but I'm certsin something like this will emerge. But here's where Harper gets things completely wrong:

It is impossible to know what is in someone’s head or heart in their final moments. I have to imagine, though, that Arday understood well enough the world he had entered and how its rules tend to work: When you are Black, some people will open the door for you far wider than they should. And when that door abruptly comes swinging shut, you will be offered no second chances.

Arday's problem wasn't that he was black (or Black). His problem was that he had a severe disability, and he'd gone well past the point of being able to cover up for it. Realistically, if it becomes clear by age 40 that you aren't capable of switching from a fantasy world to the real one when necessary, there's not a lot of hope you can function well as an adult. Second chances don't come into it.

Story Published

As part of restarting my literary career, I just had a story published at Twist & Twain, Don't Worry, te Fix is In.