Testing Bruce's Law
The New Yorker piece I linked yesterday, which is aimed at an elitist audience sympathetic to Biden's agenda, reflects the conventional wisdom surrounding tomorrow's key deadline to vote on the $1.5 trillion bipartisan infrastructure package:
On Wednesday, Biden spent five hours with Democratic members of Congress, in various groupings, in search of an elusive deal, and will surely be working the phones right up until Monday’s deadline for the House vote on the infrastructure bill—and beyond.
There it is, we'll be working on it all weekend, right up to Monday! Well, the first question is whether that's in fact what they're doing. Are they in the office? Are the phone lines humming? Well, no.President Joe Biden left the White House on Friday for another weekend away from Washington, DC, as Democrats continue fighting over his planned $5 trillion in spending.
The president spoke with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer on the phone in the afternoon before he boarded Marine One for Camp David.
. . . The White House cited “progress” in a readout of the call sent to reporters after Biden left.
“The three agreed to stay in touch about their outreach through the weekend,” the readout concluded.
Well, how close to agreement are the various sides? Even before the cliffhanger weekends I experienced in my corporate days, I had a pretty good idea of how much work needed to be done to meet the Monday deadline and how realistic a goal it was to finish it in a weekend. (Actually, the programmers had been goofing off for many months, and a single weekend never made a difference.)What puzzles me is how difficult it's been to find realistic estimates of the House whip count. The numbers in most stories seem very small -- it's the Squad, AOC and a half dozen harpies, versus the House moderates, eight or ten who forced the September 27 vote on Pelosi some weeks ago. But the actual numbers, as far as I can tell, are much larger:
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) said Friday that 50 House Democrats will oppose the $1.2 trillion “bipartisan” infrastructure bill, which is scheduled for a vote Monday.
“Pramila Jayapal told me at least 50 of her progressive members still plan to vote to sink the infrastructure bill if it goes forward Monday,” a CNN reporter tweeted. “She added that leadership taking some steps to move ahead on the big reconciliation bill is ‘not enough.'”
. . . When Jayapal was interviewed Wednesday on CNN, she explained she is concerned the $3.5 trillion reconciliation package will not pass the House if the Democrats give up leverage and pass the $1.2 trillion bill without its far more expansive cousin, which is full of far-left goodies.
Well, what about the Republicans? We're told that Speaker Pelosi can lose only a few Democrat votes, but if she loses 50, can the Republicans make up for it and pass the package? It doesn't look that way, according to Politico:Fewer than a dozen House Republicans are expected to vote for the $550 billion infrastructure bill — which got 19 Senate GOP votes last month — according to multiple lawmakers in the party.
If House Democrats keep pushing their two-track plan for a party-line social spending bill and a bipartisan infrastructure bill, they can't expect many GOP passengers on that second train.
. . . Those numbers are still in flux, the members said, addressing the closely held vote count candidly on condition of anonymity.
Being Politico, the piece is sanguine about the possibility that the House Progressive Caucus can be prevailed upon to decouple the $1.5 trillion bill from the $3.5 trillion bill. But as of Friday, it was fairly plain this wasn't going to happen.In the meantime, Biden is at Camp David, but he's sure gonna keep in touch.
This will be a key test of Bruce's Law. My bet is there's no vote tomorrow.
