The Plebs Must Be Punished

The situation is fluid, but the powers that be are effectively making sure last year's dumpster fire burns uninterrupted. As of today, Trump has 11 days left in office, and there's no indication that he'll order anyone to seize the White House to keep him inside. Yet, amid calls to invoke the 25th Amendment, there's apparently serious talk of a second impeachment. Just the process of debate on the House floor and scheduling a vote will presumably take enough time to make the whole thing moot come January 20.

This is kabuki and an apparent acknowledgement that the US Congress has nothung important to do. Pelosi's position seems to be just an extension of her tearing up of Trump's State of the Union message last winter. With close majorities in both houses following a contentious election, the majoity's position seems to be unified mostly around the position that the plebs must be punished for voting in some proportion for Trump.

This isn't leadership. There's currently a vacuum.

More California COVID Floundering

In a remarkably unserious move,

California public health officials issued an updated travel advisory Wednesday, discouraging non-essential into and out of the state.

The new advisory replaces the pre-holiday advisory that asked travelers coming into California to self-isolate for 14 days. As of Wednesday [Jan 6], the California Department of Public Health says those coming back into the state should self-quarantine for 10 days.

. . . That 10-day period does not apply to health care workers and emergency responders coming in to help the state’s struggling hospital system.

Residents are also being asked to avoid traveling to places in the state that are more than 120 miles from their homes, or to other states or countries.

That recommendation does not apply to residents who have to travel for things like work, study or immediate medical care, or those who routinely travel out of the state or the country for essential reasons.

So let's parse this out. Two weeks ago, the self-quarantine period was 14 days, now it's ten. Science told us to change it. However, this is not enforced -- neither the hotels nor the airlines, which badly need the business, check your Ausweis or your interstate travel authorization, much less law enforcement, which has washed its hands of this. But if they did, if you told them you were under the gotta-do-it-anyhow exception, they'd wave you right through.

Before Wednsday, I could drive as far as Fresno to watch trains, but now I can drive only to San Diego or Bakersfield, but of course, that's non-essential travel, so if I actually needed to drive to Fresno today, I could still. do it. Except,, unless I've come to their attention for something else, the Fresno County Sheriff's Office won't give two flips about it either way.

How will any of this prevent a single case of COVID anywhere in the state? Is there an adult asking this sort of question of any of these people?

There are, though, informed adults around, they just aren't making the decisions.

San Francisco’s indefinite extension of its stay-at-home and 10-day quarantine orders prompted a University of California-San Francisco infectious disease specialist to speak out.

It may actually increase the spread of the novel coronavirus because more people will gather indoors, where scientists have long known the threat of infection is highest, Monica Gandhi, medical director of the HIV Clinic at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, told CBS San Francisco.

Mayor London Breed’s order is not data-driven and is likely to backfire with the public, she said:

She believes a data-driven approach would safely allow outdoor dining with some mitigation protocols and limited indoor gym capacity:

“We never reached those hospitalizations or ICU capacity concerns that the state had set as metrics for this degree of shutdown,” she said. “And then to continue it indefinitely, as kind of our New Year’s present to San Francisco, didn’t make sense to me.”

. . . The mayor is at risk of losing public trust, however, according to Gandhi. She believes a data-driven approach would safely allow outdoor dining with some mitigation protocols and limited indoor gym capacity:

It's increasngly plain that California leadership is driven by a need to look like they're doing something, but their options are limited, because any furher lockdowns will either be ignored or lead to civil unrest. Thus the measures they're enacting in new decrees every couple of weeks are effectively nugatory. This can't continue, but it's reflective of a problem that's reached the national level.

Hospital Ship Kabuki

Last week, LA County Supervisor Janice Hahn wrote to Gov Newsom asking that he try to get the Navy hospital ship Mercy back to LA, although it went largely unused when it was sent here last spring.

Los Angeles County Supervisor Janice Hahn has written a letter to California Governor Gavin Newsom supporting SEIU 721’s request for additional healthcare workers in Los Angeles County hospitals in response to the surge of COVID-19 hospitalizations. Hahn is also requesting that Governor Newsom call on federal partners to dispatch the USNS Mercy hospital ship to the Port of Los Angeles.

“Our SEIU healthcare workers are exhausted and our hospitals are overwhelmed. They need backup,” said Supervisor Janice Hahn. “This surge is the crisis that we dreaded all along. We need as much support as we can get for our healthcare workers and we need the USNS Mercy back in the Port of Los Angeles.”

As far as I'm aware, Gov Newsom hasn't replied to the request, and in fact the Mercy is in drydock up in Portland and won't be serviceable for some months. Supervisor Hahn is engaging in kabuki for the benefit of her special-interest donors.

On the other hand, Hahn is also exploiting the leadership vacuum higher up. Gov Newsom has had almost nothing to say for several weeks, other than to extend the latest lockdowns.But California has been slow and inefficient in distributing vaccines:

As of Tuesday [Jan 5], California had administered 456,980 vaccine doses, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — just 23 percent of the 2 million doses the federal government has distributed to the state. California Department of Public Health figures varied slightly, reporting a somewhat smaller 1.8 million doses allocated and 459,564 administered, or 26 percent.

. . . By comparison, nearly 1.4 million doses were distributed to Texas, of which 451,210, or 33%, were administered, the CDC reported. Florida administered 264,512 doses, or 23%, out of 1.2 million distributed. New York administered 299,428 doses, or 32%, out of 934,925 distributed.

It appears that Newsom is overwhelmed by COVID, while the Recall Newsom movement seems to leave him with few options if he maintains his present course of continued lockdowns but no improvement in statistics. Why doesn't he simply take a highly visible role in making sure the faccine gets out? That would solve the problem while portraying him as someone who should be kept in office to do an important job.

Not sure if that's in him.

Ancient Aliens And Occam's Razor

One byproduct of my conversion to Roman Catholicism has been a much greater appreciation for Aristotle, who was a major influence on Aquinas and other Scholastic thinkers. An Aristotelian looks for causes. On the other hand, William of Ockham, a prominent Scholastic, established the Law of Parsimony, which says that entities should not be multiplied without necessity.

This brings us to the popular idea that at some time prior to written history, space aliens came to the planet and built the major ancient monuments in both hemispheres. This is a semi-Aristotelian view, since proponents are actually raising worthwhile and reasonable questions about causes. Why the widespread ancient interest in astronomy, which appears to have been remarkably precise? How was this information transmitted through generations without what we currently understand as writing?

Why do so many ancient structures in both hemispheres take the form of pyramids? Why are they precisely laid out according to astronomical orientation? Why are even those that aren't pyramids laid out accoding to the solstice?

It seems to me that these are all very good questions, that I think Aristotle and Aquinas would think well worth asking, although the information that raises them probably wasn't available in their time. On the other hand, Occam's Razor suggests that the current popular theory that ancient aliens brought technology to humans from outer space multiplies entities without necessity. We have absolutely no evidence of intelligent life anywhere but right here, despite enormous national treasure expended in space telescopes and Mars missions explicitly intended to discover just that.

I think back to my high school and college world history courses, and while they predate von Däniken and Chariots of the Gods, I have a sense that if I'd posed those questions in class, much less written about them in an assignment, even leaving out the space aliens, I would have been dismissed as impertinent and unserious.. Why? These are good questions. Just because space aliens are the only current systematic answer to them doesn't mean they can't be asked without reference to the aliens.

As I wander the web, I run across a number of related question groups that don't have good answers. They range from whether human settlement of the western hemisphere dates only from migration over the Alaskan land bridge less than 20,000 years ago, to how much European and Asian exploration of the western hemisphere took place before Columbus, to more recent and more mundance questions like just what went in at Oak Island before the late 18th century, because irrespective of pirate or Templar treasure, it's plain there was a lot of mysterious activity.

I guess I've always been a contrarian, so I like these questions. Even without clear answers, they're intriguing in themselves. As the opportunity arises, I want to start looking at them here, observing good Aristotelian principles like the Law of Parsimony.

The Metastasizing COVID Legal Morass

I've been following the Harvest Rock Church's case in Pasadena, CA since its inception last spring. As I covered here a month ago, the US Supreme Court sent the case back to the Ninth Circuit for reevaluation in light of its Diocese of Brooklyn action, which essentially signaled that it would find restrictions on attendance specifically tailored to churces a violation of the free exercise clause of the US Constitution. However, this didn't decide anything, it just kicked the issue back to the district court.

The consensus at the time was that Harvest Rock's attorneys would need to relitigate the whole issue back up from the trial court to the Ninth Circuit, and that's what's been happening. As of late last week, Harvest Rock and the state have been filing new briefs with the Ninth Circuit. The court has been asking interesting questions. As outlined here,

The Court of Appeals requested supplemental briefing by the parties to address whether (1) the LA County Order affects the case, (2) the churches still challenge the singing and chanting ban, and (3) the churches challenge includes the new Regional Stay-at-Home Order in addition to Gov. Gavin Newsom's "Blueprint."

These go to the heart of the matter. The first question is whether the LA County order affects the case. This is important, because the principal Harvest Rock church is located in Pasadena, which, althougb it's located in LA County, has its own health department. An LA County health department order does not affect Pasadena. For instance, the LA County health department in mid-December anounced that both worship services and protests were constitutionally protected and withdrew its prohibition against indoor worship, subject to vague rules. However, no other county in California has made any similar announcement.

In addition, the Pasadena health department did not apply the LA County health department's order banning outdoor dining, so it's still possible in Pasadena to eat outoors at a restaurant, but not anywhere else in LA County. But in Pasadena, you can't go to church indoors, although you more or less can now elsewhere in LA County. Thus the case does more or less apply to Harvest Rock, but there's another glitch, in that only the principal Harvest Rock church is in Pasadena, but it has branch churches elsewhere in LA County and elsewhere in the state.

I think the bottom line is that this whole thing is absurd and unenforceable, and the situation can change at any time if either the governor, local health departments, or any other local authority issues any new decree.

The second question is entirely new, and I haven't seen it raised anywhere else. A central point in COVID controls has been that singing or chanting in church is contagious, since people breathe harder when singing and thus spew germs. So even if indoor worship is allowed in individual jurisdictions, a ban on singing and chanting is still near universal. But Harvest Rock is now raising the issue that any ban on singing or chanting is aimed specifically at worship and religion and is a violation of the free exercise clause. Interesting indeed. There's no question that government here is regulating liturgy.

The third question is exactly which stay-at-home order is involved here. As of last summer, there was a color coded order based on COVID statistics that rated individual counties. But in early December, Gov Newsom imposed a whole new order based on regional ICU capacity that somehow overrides, supplements, coexists, or something with the color coded order. The question is exactly which decree Harvest Rock is violating by holding indoor services, none of which has been legislatively enacted -- State Decree I, State Decree II, the LA County Decree I, County Decree II, or the Pasadena Decree,,which conflicts with County Decree II?

Naturally, due process requires that an accusation be brought for violation of a speciric law umder speciric circumstances. By the same token, a petition for redress requires a speciric grievance against a speciric condition. The current panic is taking us farther and farther from these basic questions, which suggests to me once more that we're talking about a panic, not any serious health crisis.

Dirty Harry The Enforcer And 1976

It goes without saying that even fairly recent successful Hollywood films couldn't be made today. I've already talked about the Jason Bourne films that put the CIA in a darkly threatening and subversive light that's now a bit too topical. By the same token, the Dirty Harry series starring Clint Eastwood not only couln't be made now, but I wouldn't rule out cancel culture taking DVD copies off the market entirely. But recently I saw the third film in that series, The Enforcer (1976), which I think is by far the best and, like the Bourne films, retrospectively revealing.

The first Dirty Harry flim, which had that title (1971), had a contemporary, San Francisco-based story, dealing with a Zodiac style serial killer. The second, Magnum Force (1973), wasn't so much rooted in current events and dealt with a police vigilante squad. But The Enforcer took a real issue by the horns, a terrorist group made up of upper-class twentysomethings allied with Lumpenproletariat thugs. By 1976, the US had been through several instances of this, via the Weather Undergound, the Symbionese Liberation Army, and other terrorist outbreaks of the period.

The theme of all the Cirty Harry films is Inspector Callahan's integrity, competence, and disregard for red tape, contrasted with the incompetence, cowardice and venality of politicians and the upper echelons of the police department. In this, the character probably comes from the Western genre, rather than detective fiction -- Callahan owes much more to the sheriff in films like High Noon than the disillusioned cop in the film noir The City That Never Sleeps.

The main action in The Enforcer centers on Callahan's investigation of a terrorist raid in which a group seizes a cache of military rockets. Callahan's superior, Captain McKay. eager to curry favor with the mayor and department brass, insists that a black militant group is responsible. Callahan is skeptical and meets Big Ed Mustapha, leader of the black militant group. He convinces Mustapha that, as men of integrity, they're actually on the same side, and Mustapha provides him with information on the actual terrorists, who by implication are rich white kids allied with pimps and punks.

However, Captain McKay is running his own inept investigation at cross-purposes to Callahan and arrests Mustapha and the other black militants. McKay attempts to take credit for solving the case and tries to engineer a public commendation from the mayor. However, the actual terrorists kidnap the mayor and spirit him out to Alcatraz Island. McKay and the department brass readily agree to the terrorists' demands to secure the mayor's release, but Callahan, already on the scene in Alcatraz, kills the terrorist ringleader before McKay and the police brass can arrive to surrender.

Like the Bourne films, The Enforcer is unintentionally insightful in a way that reverberates through subsequent decades. Referring to the rich white terrorists and the social tensions they inflame and exploit, Callahan speaks several times of a "war" that's under way, with the implication that cowardly politicians and their bureaucratic enablers allow it to continue. Thinking forward to the BLM riots of 2020, it's nard not to conclude that nothing's changed. There's a war, with the elites and entrenched bureaucrats trying to confuse the rest of us about who's on what side.

This in turn makes me wonder if 1976 is a year we should pay closer attention to. Robert Barnes thinks we should look to the election years 1824 and 1876. Others say look to 2000 and Bush v Gore. Victor Davis Hanson recently suggested 1968, but if you think about it, 1968 was the start of the trends that led to 1976, and there's a lot about The Enforcer and what it says about 1976 that speaks to us today.

Just for starters, 1976 was the election held in the wake of the Watergate scandal, Nixon's resignation, and Ford's pardon of Nixon, all of which led to the election of the incompetent Jimmy Carter. And hasn't it gradually come out that in Watergate, the FBI was the behind-the-scenes player, with the deep state Deep Throat pulling a lot of the strings, working closely with uber-establishment media? There's a lot to reflect on here.

No More 2020 Dumpster Fire!!!

The big year-end meme for 2020 was the dumpster fire, and this seems to have carried the implication that 2021 wouldn't be the same. I'm not sure why. No matter who is president, the worldwide COVID panic continues in full effect. I couln't get a haircut last week, and I won't be able to get one this week, either. And as barbers realize that government decrees make their business unpredictable, they're leaving it -- and this will be the case even after things get back to "normal". There'll simply be fewer barbers, hair salons, and sit-down restaurants.

But insofar as people fought back, they made progress in 2020, and this still needs to be done in the coming year. In particular, the US Supreme Court ruling in the Diocese of Brooklyn case, while it hasn't been a magic bullet, has led to progress in free exercise of religion. We received this letter from our parish yestwrday:

As you may have heard recently, places of worship are now permitted by the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Health to offer faith-based services, or otherwise allow access for faith-based practices, indoors and outdoors, provided that strict physical distancing is followed, which requires a minimum of six feet between persons from different households. With this latest change, parishes throughout the Archdiocese of Los Angeles including [redacted] now will begin offering indoor Masses throughout the week. These indoor Masses will be in addition to current offerings of outdoor, drive-in and live stream Masses to meet the comfort level of all who wish to attend.​​

In spite of certain Masses being moved indoors, please know that we will still have all windows and doors open to allow for air circulation even during the cold weather months. Those who wish to attend our indoor Mass times but prefer to sit outdoors will always have the option to sit and listen to the Mass from our Courtyard of Charity. We advise that you check the weather and dress accordingly. Also, all individuals planning for funerals, baptisms, and weddings in the coming months will be given the option to hold these events either inside our church or outdoors at our Courtyard of Charity based on their personal preference.

This is actually how I envisioned Catholic dioceses moving forward some months ago, although I was assuming it would be possible much sooner. There's a general panic still in effect, and people will have varying levels of comfort with indoor masses. Before LA County relaxed the prohibition on indoor worship, our parish had been experimenting with a range of options, from livestream to outdoors in the patio, to drive-in in the parking lot, and for the time being, indoor masses will simply be added to the mix.

Given the arbitrariness and unpredictability of the civil situation, this level of flexibility is highly prudent. The county can change its mind at any time, or the mayor, the governor, or even the federal government can intervene as well, out of the blue. The dumpster fire ain't out by any means.

The other important legal cases over COVID have been less active over the holidays. I have a list of those I'm following and hope to report on new developments.

Mark Clay McGowan, the Bakersfield, CA YouTuber who'd been in the hospital for six weeks with COVID, is finally out and recovering at home.

So there are signs of hope, but the dumpster fire is still raging.