NASA Hires Theologians To Prepare Earthlings For Alien Life

How are government theologians, on contract or on the payroll, not a violation of the Establishment Clause of the US First Amendment?

NASA is looking to the heavens for help with assessing how humans will react if alien life is found on other planets and how the discovery could impact our ideas of gods [sic] and creation.

The agency hired 24 theologians to take part in its program at the Center for Theological Inquiry (CTI) at Princeton University in New Jersey, which NASA gave a $1.1 million grant to in 2014.

CTI is described as building 'bridges of under understanding by convening theologians, scientists, scholars, and policymakers to think together - and inform public thinking - on global concerns.'

So let's back up. Theology is literally the "study of God". As even our Hollywood Episcopalian rector explained back in the day, it isn't the study of whether there's a God, it's the study of the God Who exists, and as a practical matter in the West, it's the God of the Judeo-Christian tradition. Central to that tradition is a creation in which a unique creature, Man, is fashioned in God's image, equipped with reason, skill, language, and free will to operate in creation toward a mutual destiny with God.

Now, things may very well be otherwise. Buddhists, Mormons, and Scientologists are not much in tune with the Christian creeds, but at least the US First Amendment prevents the government from choosing sides. In modern times, though, governments have sought the convenience of eliminating Judeo-Christian moral traditions that stand in the way of eugenic or redistributionist policies. The governments that wish these things most fervently seem to think that materialist, anti-religious, or at least anti-Judeo-Christian, views are most tolerant of such policies.

One of the chief obstacles to more widespread anti-Judeo-Christian materialism as relates to the observable universe has been Fermi's Paradox, which according to Wikipedia says

The Fermi paradox is the conflict between the lack of clear, obvious evidence for extraterrestrial life and various high estimates for their existence.

As a 2015 article put it, "If life is so easy, someone from somewhere must have come calling by now."

Italian-American physicist Enrico Fermi's name is associated with the paradox because of a casual conversation in the summer of 1950 with fellow physicists Edward Teller, Herbert York and Emil Konopinski. While walking to lunch, the men discussed recent UFO reports and the possibility of faster-than-light travel. The conversation moved on to other topics, until during lunch Fermi blurted out, "But where is everybody?" (although the exact quote is uncertain).

In fact, the whole history of Mars probes so far may be characterized as a great vindication of Fermi, with successive expeditions, ranging from photo overflights to rovers digging beneath the soil, proving fruitless in detecting even the tiniest fossil evidence of ancient life, despite the confident predictions of the neo-Darwinian model that, given the presence of water, organic elements, and enough time for the process to occur, life must certainly have emerged from the primordial ooze there as it did on earth.

The names of the NASA Mars rovers to date suggest progressive stages of frustration with this project: Sojourner, Spirit and Opportunity, Curiosity, and Perseverance. Might the next ones move on to Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression and Acceptance? I've come increasingly to believe that the whole space exploration effort, especially following the passing of Wernher von Braun, who did come to see a transcendent purpose in it, has been an epic boondoggle of an attempt to refute the Judeo-Christian picture of creation, with Man created uniquely in God's image. Get rid of that, and everything is permitted.

It's been an immense expenditure of national and world treasure to find even a single microscopic piece of material evidence to contradict it, and so far, it's failed. But no matter, we'll find it yet, if not under Martian sands, then most certainly in the ammonia oceans under the ice of Jupiter's moons. Whenever it happens, with keen foresight, the government will have a team of theologians on the payroll to prepare us earthlings for the event. The only one mentioned so far by name is The Revd Dr Andrew Davison MA DPhil (Oxford) MA PhD, an Anglican. I'm sure he'll do just fine, with those degrees and all, and Anglicans are certainly at the forefront of permitting everything.

The ray of hope is that Musk and Bezos are replacing the feckless government objectives with an efficiency borne of crass commercialism, which I find reassuring.

"Let's Go Brandon, I Agree!"

I guess everyone was on holiday when President Brandon made his remark, and so far, I've seen little worthwhile commentary. The best was

COVID has not been shut down as he promised. And his Build Back Better agenda has been torched as well. So, yes—'let's go Brandon’ and Merry Christmas.

Biden agreeing that he should go screw himself is probably the greatest Christmas gift of all time.

But does this say anything about Brandon's mental condition? It was a complete, coherent statement generally reflective of context. If the caller had said, "Let's go, Yankees!" And Brandon had agreed, there would have been absolutely nothing notable about it. On the other hand, if the president had been muttering about spiders creeping up his arms, that would have been something more clearly indicative of a problem. But we didn't see anything like that.

I think it was simply a gaffe, something Biden has been known for throughout his career. Granted it was a gaffe at the historic level, approaching Marie Antoinette's "Let them eat cake!" -- and Brandon may yet surpass himself and even Marie Antoinette in the time remaining to him -- but it was just a gaffe.

This is not to suggest there isn't a basic problem, just that the problem isn't pathological. He's dumb as a rock, but he isn't sick in any traditional sense, which really removes the 25th Amendment as a solution to the ongoing quiet constitutional crisis.

There's actually a second data point that for me is almost as concerning:

President Joe Biden and First Lady Jill Biden did not go to church for Christmas, but instead chose to watch the Mass virtually from the White House.

The White House did not explain why Bidens skipped the church for Christmas, as the president typically attends Catholic Mass regularly.

Although US Catholic bishops typically dispensed Catholics from the obligation to attend Sunday mass during he pandemic, this obligation was restored in both Washington, DC and Wilmington, DE last summer:

On June 2, Washington Cardinal Wilton Gregory and the Bishops of the Province of Baltimore issued a joint statement lifting the general dispensation from the obligation of Catholics to attend Mass on Sunday and Holy Days, beginning the weekend of June 26 and 27.

The statement is signed by Cardinal Gregory of the Archdiocese of Washington; Archbishop William E. Lori of the Archdiocese of Baltimore; Bishop Michael F. Burbidge of the Diocese of Arlington; Bishop Barry C. Knestout of the Diocese of Richmond; Bishop Mark E. Brennan of the Diocese of Wheeling-Charleston; and Bishop William Francis Malooly, Apostolic Administrator of the Diocese of Wilmington.

So although President Brandon considers himself a "devout Catholic", skipping mass on a day of obligation, which includes both Christmas and regular Sundays, is a no-no. This year, observant Catholics must attend mass on both December 25 and the next day, December 26, which is a Sunday. Strictly speaking, Brandon must now make it to Reconciliation and confess not one, but two mortal sins, as well as a likely third, scandal, since as a public figure he set an example of skipping mass.

And of all people, Brandon or Dr Jill could hardly be better placed to make a call to the archdiocese and have them send over a priest for private masses on both days, no questions asked.

I think this goes not to the president's mental health but to a serious spiritual deficiency, which we also see in nominal Catholic Speaker Pelosi, where some sense of entitlement seems to exempt both of them from ordinary obligations. And as best I can see, they've both been that way all their lives. This isn't age related. And does either do anything close to tithing not just their official salaries, but the multimillions in graft, lagniappes, and baksheesh that clearly stream their way?

I think this is not least among the issues that underlie the current national disquiet. Pretending it's senility or dementia, or even simple incompetence, dodges the actual problem.

Merry Christmas

“I Want To Start By Acknowledging How Tired And Worried You Are"

I tried to watch Biden's latest COVID speech on the web, but it became plain after just a few minutes that it was flat, listless, and desultory. I think it's fair that he himself may have been tired and worried, but the country at large was busy with Christmas and fairly confident that Biden would be too terrified to try to lock anything serious down, so nobody actually paid much attention. I looked at Politico's account of the speech:

But even he must know he faces a near-impossible task, as he tries to glue back together some sense of unity in a Humpty Dumpty of a nation consumed by disease, division and distrust. The combination of a worn-out public, mixed messaging from health officials and stiff skepticism from large swathes of the country mean the president will struggle to break through.

. . . But restoring trust, and his own political sheen, is difficult when Biden is also the de facto voice of pandemic response at a time of plummeting trust in science and expertise, particularly (though not exclusively) among Republicans.

It's notable that in this address, unlike prior ones from both Trump and himself, he wasn't flanked by the likes of Drs Fauci and Birx. No prestige to be drawn from them now. His problem is that the moral panic narratives that drove the 2020 election and the leftist optimism of 2021 have run their course.

It didn't help, for instance, that in the public health establishment's effort to revitalize vaccination hysteria, two fully vaxxed and boosted US senators tested positive over the past weekend, but this simply confirmed the growing public awareness, and indeed the forced acknowledgement by the public health establishment itself, that the fully vaxxed and boosted can contract and spread COVID. As one commentator noted, it's as though the highway safety people have had to acknowledge that seat belts don't necessarily work.

This in turn destroyed the most recent attempt to identify folk devils for the panic, the anti-vaxxers and the unvaxxed. Last week, Biden tried to threaten them with, if not the power of the law, at least the wrath of the Almighty:

"For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death... for themselves, their families and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm," Biden continued.

This week it was,

“If you’re not fully vaccinated, you have good reason to be concerned. You’re at higher risk of getting sick and at higher risk of passing it to your friends and family.”

. . . “Because Omicron spreads so easily, we will see some vaccinated people test positive – perhaps in large numbers. Vaccinated people may get sick, but they are still protected from severe illness and death.”

This is not the FDR of Pearl Harbor:

No matter how long it may take us to overcome this premeditated invasion, the American people in their righteous might will win through to absolute victory.

. . . I assert that we will not only defend ourselves to the uttermost, but will make it very certain that this form of treachery shall never again endanger us.

. . . With confidence in our armed forces, with the unbounding determination of our people, we will gain the inevitable triumph—so help us God.

If from nothing other than a rhetorical standpoint, Biden's speech in contrast was a tired acknowledgement that there's really not much we can do. Get vaxxed. It's actually slightly better than not getting vaxxed. Please get vaxxed. But the daily reports are that the most vaxxed US regions, and the most vaxxed countries, are the ones with record COVID surges.

The justification for the BLM riots, systemic racism in society merely reflected in universal police misconduct, has been steadily collapsing in the second half of this year. The COVID narrative, that Science led by Dr Fauci would prevail over an anti-Science Donald Trump and defeat COVID, is collapsing with Omicron and a determination to restore a normal Christmas season.

Ex presidents don't hold press conferences. Period. Donald Trump will hold one on January 6 to contest the House "insurrection" investigation. I'm not sure if he'll make a comeback, nor if he does that it'll be an unalloyed good thing, but it's a sign that things are changing. Big time.

"Is There Pirate Treasure On Oak Island?"

With a great deal happening but no news, I figured I'd turn to a subject I've intended to cover for some time anyhow, the Oak Island treasure and the current status of the search. We went to cable in 2012, not long after the Curse of Oak Island series started on the History Channel, and for several years I didn't bother with it, taking what I now recognize is the elitist approach that the whole thing is a fraud. It wasn't until about season 5 that I started paying attention, and after several years, it's become our must-watch show above all others.

The YouTube link above consists of a university-educated toff from the UK sneering at the whole enterprise, which for me is an indication that he simply doesn't watch the show. He does mention the current main players, the brothers Rick and Marty Lagina -- he mispronounces their names, which are spoken with a hard "g", another clear indication that he's probably never watched the show, and he basically dismisses them as a couple of rich eccentric Americans.

The problem is that the Laginas, especially Marty, are rich, but they aren't trust fund dilettantes. The family money seems to come from Marty, who first made a fortune from fracking, but when that became politically incorrect, he sold that business, turned around, and made another fortune from wind power, currently much more politically acceptable. This is a canny guy. He runs a vineyard as a sideline, but it looks like much of his surplus wealth goes to indulge his older brother Rick, a retired postal worker, who'd grown fascinated with the Oak Island mystery after seeing a Readers Digest article in January 1965.

To me, the actual story arc of the show revolves around Marty, even though Rick is the true believer. Marty pretty clearly began the project from love of Rick, but for much of the story was a treasure skeptic until very recent finds. On the other hand, the fact remains that Marty is an extremely canny guy. Whether or not Rick was chasing a will-o-the-wisp, when he sank money into the island, he was careful to negotiate a very favorable agreement with the province of Nova Scotia that ensured, should there actually be treasure on the island, that it would get 10%, the Laginas and their partners the remainder.

This was maybe a decade ago, when it was plenty easy for the province to sign anything on the bet that the Laginas were just as crazy as all the unsuccessful searchers had been for 200 years. Crazy indeed. The History Channel had also been negotiating with the Laginas from the start to run a show along the line of their other fare like Ancient Aliens, but it looks like Marty also held out with them for the best deal possible, and he now pretty clearly has control of the show, leaving aside the money it brings in. I agree with the YouTuber to some extent when he says, "There definitely is money there, if you own the History Channel." But Marty gets a cut, and he ain't done.

The problem for the province is there's incresingly money there in the presence of the show, but worse, Marty's canniness is coming through year on year. He runs what can only be characterized as a business operation behind the scenes. The dialogue alone in the show suggests that this is a structured operation, with Marty as CEO with signature authority, Rick as COO, and other Lagina family members and business partners with strictly delegated areas of authority. My surmise is that there are attorneys and accountants -- good ones -- behind the scenes. The intent is to make money.

We now get to the current state of the story arc: over the past couple of years, the systematic effort Marty has sponsored, with serious investment money to bring in heavy equipment for search and excavation, has been making it more likely that something important is actually down there. The YouTuber above thinks it's just random coins, brooches, and baubles that don't prove much of anything, but just in the last two seasons, the Lagina operation has uncovered a road, acknowledged to be a major piece of European civil engineering from the 1500s or 1600s, leading from a potential dock to the money pit area.

Among other things, this has led Marty to buy up almost all the rest of the island. He's a canny guy.

This in turn has led the province to realize there's more to the project than they'd thought when Marty negotiated the first agreement, and over a few seasons, it has been trying to increase its control over the operation. They appear to have unilaterally revised the agreement to place archaeoligists who report to the province on site, with increasing requirements to approve all activity. Marty up to this year has gone along, since academically respectable archaeologists on site do nothing but increase the prestige of the Laginas.

This has also done a great deal for the neighboring area around Lunenburg, NS. Occasional interviews with local business owners indicate that the popularity of the show has extended what had been just a fair-weather vacation season to year-round business. Tourists swarm to pubs sometimes featured on the show in hopes of spotting the Laginas there. Stores, restaurants, bed and breakfasts, and so forth all benefit. The Irving Company, a New Brunswick based player in construction and heavy equipment, is also doing quite well.

This year, Nova Scotia made a heavy-handed effort to shut down much of the operation on the island on the archaeological excuse that First Nations artifacts had been discovered in the search, and nothing much could be undertaken until the First Nations had also gotten involved. Right.

Marty is a canny guy. A not much emphasized plot line over recent episodes suggests the province is backing down. After all, the Irving Company wants the business. The Lunenburg businesses want the search to continue. Marty kicked most of the archaeologists off the island as the province finds it will nevertheless actually approve new excavations. It's good not to have bad publicty on one of the most popular TV shows. I've got to assume the offstage attorneys also earned their fees.

The show is popular because it's an American story, much as UK toffs miss the point. My admiration for Marty Lagina grows by the week.

The Quiet Constitutional Crisis

The heretofore unmentioned circumstance is entering public discourse:

Vice President Harris asserted that Joe Biden is president — not Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) — during a tense exchange on Charlamagne Tha God's Comedy Central show.

Charlamagne asked Harris to name the country's "real president."

"It's Joe Biden. And don't start talking like a Republican about asking whether or not he's president," Harris told the host of "Tha God's Honest Truth" on Friday in an interview on the weekly late-night program.

More remarkable is an op-ed in The Hill that suggests -- for the first time I'm aware in polite discussion -- that the Spiro Agnew option is potentially on the table.

The last vice president of the United States to resign was Spiro Agnew in October 1973. Should Vice President Harris be the next?

. . . Ironically, as more and more Republicans hope that Harris remains on the ticket — especially as the candidate for president — a growing number of Democrats are publicly vocalizing their concerns about President Biden and Harris as viable candidates three years from now.

Agnew, Richard Nixon’s vice president, resigned after pleading no contest to a felony count of tax evasion. His resignation came just 10 months before Nixon resigned the presidency in disgrace. Their resignations set off a “musical chairs” version of appointed vice presidents, and soon after, Gerald Ford and Nelson Rockefeller assumed the country’s two highest offices.

I first mentioned the Agnew scenario here back on July 3 as I noted the increasing chatter about Harris's poor performance. but nobody polite at that point mentioned Agnew or any potential two-shoe drop. The implication in the link above is that influential people are thinking past a likely 2022 midterm defeat and are beginning to worry that neither Biden nor Harris is a viable 2024 candidate, while Donald Trump hasn't gone away and is beating Biden in polls.

But I think making Biden and Harris a theoretical issue for 2024 is a polite disguise for actually saying the problem is much more immediate. The two people now in the presidential line of succession are Vice President Harris and Speaker Pelosi. Should Harris be coaxed into resigning, Pelosi would be second in line over a period in which a new vice president would need to be nominated and confirmed, which, with congress very narrowly divided and few obvious choices for her replacement, could be long and contentious.

It's increasigly plain that the problem isn't Donald Trump in 2024. The problem is Biden and his successors now, with potentialy urgent issues like a Russian invasion of Ukraine or a Chinese invasion of Taiwan on the radar. The US probably doesn't have the luxury of the 10 month interregnum it had in the Agnew-Nixon maneuver.

What's beginning to occur to me -- and I'm not sure why it's taken so long -- is that political leaders are normally well spoken. The most poorly spoken president in my lifetime other than Biden was Dubya, but his problem was in large part just that he spoke Texan, not Yale, and with a teleprompter, he was fine. Biden is never anything but a stream of misspeaks, malapropisms, stutters, slips, slurs, and hypercorrections, and the teleprompter has no effect. Harris never comes off as anything but shallow and unserious. Advice from Peggy Noonan that she should serious up and rise to her potential reponsibilty is delusional.

Pelosi is an octogenarian corrupt machine politician in a safe seat, and her communication skills are generally at a par with Biden and Harris. Her histrionic public style verges on drag queen. Leaving policy issues completely aside, none has actual leadership qualities. But considering the now certain failure of the BBB, which Pelosi had characterized as her "legacy", she's become as much a lame duck as Biden.

I think it's increasingly likely we'll be seeing an Agnew scenario, sooner rather than later. Whom will they nominate to replace Harris? I don't rule out Hillary Clinton.

Yeah, As I Said

According to the UK Daily Mail, US Omicron cases have doubled overnight:

The number of confirmed Omicron cases in the U.S. has nearly doubled in a period of 24 hours, and six Northeastern states saw a record number of daily COVID cases this week as the variant is now confirmed in 44 states, with New York hit the hardest.

As of Saturday morning, there were 830 cases of the Omicron COVID-19 variant confirmed by DNA sequencing across the country, a 97 percent increase from Friday morning's tally.

In reality, the true number of Omicron cases is much higher, as only 1 to 2 percent of all cases are sequenced for variant markers, but the testing data shows a disturbing national trend.

The problem is that as is increasingly reported from Europe, the Omicron variant is far milder. The Daily Mail story continues at length to conflate Delta with Omicron, but its graphs simply illustrate another point I've been making:

There's little difference between the late 2020 peak and the late 2021 peak nationally, despite the fact that by the Daily Mail's count, 72% of US residents have had at least one dose of vaccine since the 2020 peak. According to this site, 203,479,206 people or 62% of the population have been fully vaccinated. Of those, the percentages in vulnerable populations are far higher. But this has had no remotely proportional impact on cases or deaths overall in the US, currently based on the Delta variant.

The public health establishment has simply had no good explanation for this state of affairs. Its strategy throughout has been to scold the plebs for insufficient adherence to whatever the current prescription is: too many block parties; not enough masking; not enough social distance; not enough jabs; not enough boosters. In response to the new wave, it's going to be rinse, repeat.

In fact, I found a really good example of the current credentialed line in a recent New York Magazine story South Africa's Omicron wave is already peaking. Why?

First, there’s the simple limit to testing capacity. As things increase, our testing capacity doesn’t increase as fast, and so we’re missing more and more cases. That can give you a distorted picture — it could look like a plateau in Gauteng, but you could imagine it’s really a much higher crest.

I also bet we can expect a lot more underreporting of Omicron, compared to previous wave, because it’s more mild, either through existing immunity or through actual reduction of intrinsic severity. And if, on average, you’ve reduced the severity of cases, there’d be a lot of people that don’t bother to come to the hospital or to get tested. And so as a rough guess, you might go from like one in 10 cases reported in South Africa to one in 20 or even one in 30 cases — that wouldn’t seem unreasonable to me. And that makes it so that at the same caseload of Delta versus Omicron you could actually have three times as many infections with Omicron.

We could also have a change in generation interval. If we have Omicron kind of doubling at this very fast two or three day rate, you don’t actually have to have Rt be three. You could have actually just made the whole thing faster without having the number of secondary infections being much higher. And we don’t have no way [sic] of knowing that at this moment.

It's a lot of entre nous patter sprinkled with jargon leavened by "I also bet", "rough guess", "kind of", and "just made the whole thing faster", concluding with "we don't have no way of knowing that at the moment". I'm not going to check if this guy is an MD, PhD, both, or neither. He isn't a credible spokesman.

This is the looming problem with the received narrative. It's putting out Ponzi scheme numbers on how fast things are gonna get worse, such that if they don't get a whole lot worse in a matter of weeks, they'll start to lose any remaining credibility. Remember that they're claiming cases will double at a rate ranging from every 1.5 to 3 days, such that by sometime next month, everyone in the world will be sick, and there'll be nobody left to infect but the space aliens. But if things do get a whole lot worse, they look just as bad, because after more than two years, they've proven themselves utterly feckless to deal with the problem and lose any remaining credibility anyhow.

If that's all there is, my friends, then let's keep dancing, let's break out the booze, and have a ball. If that's all.